Home » Causes of the Great Depression

Causes of the Great Depression

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 marked a pivotal moment in history, unraveling the economic fabric of the roaring twenties. As we journey through the events that followed, we'll see how banking panics, the gold standard, decreased international lending, and government policies all played crucial roles in shaping the Great Depression.

Stock Market Crash of 1929

The stock market was thriving in the 1920s, with prices reaching unsustainable levels. People from all walks of life invested their savings into stocks, convinced it was a surefire way to make money. However, cracks started to show as production slowed down and unemployment crept up, despite stock prices continuing to rise.

On October 24, 1929, known as "Black Thursday," jittery investors began selling off their shares en masse, causing the market to plunge. Five days later, "Black Tuesday" saw another wave of panic selling. Millions of shares traded at rock-bottom prices, wiping out countless investors who had bought stocks on margin. The crash didn't just impact wallets; it shattered confidence. People reduced their spending, factories slashed production, and workers lost their jobs.

The speculative bubble was a significant issue, with speculators buying stocks in hopes of selling at a profit as prices climbed. Margin buying—borrowing to buy stocks—amplified the problem. When the market dipped, investors couldn't cover their loans and had to sell their stocks at fire-sale prices, fueling the downward spiral.

The crash eroded trust in the financial system. Businesses and consumers, gripped by fear, tightened their belts, further strangling the economy. Companies that couldn't secure credit closed down, putting more people out of work and deepening the crisis. Financial institutions also felt the ripple effect, with bank failures surging and spreading panic globally. This chain reaction of economic failures snowballed into what became known as the Great Depression.

A black and white photograph of panicked stockbrokers on the trading floor during the Stock Market Crash of 1929, with papers flying and people shouting.

Banking Panics and Monetary Contraction

In the early 1930s, the United States experienced four significant banking panics. During these panics, depositors, fearing their banks were on the verge of collapse, rushed to withdraw their cash, leading to the very collapses they dreaded. Each panic further eroded consumer confidence, and banks had to liquidate loans and assets at low prices to meet the sudden outflow of funds. By 1933, about one-fifth of all banks that had been operating in 1930 had failed, resulting in millions of people losing their life savings.

Fear and uncertainty led to hoarding, with people keeping cash under mattresses rather than trusting banks. This drained the banking system of available funds, making the situation more dire. Lending dried up, and businesses couldn't secure the credit they needed to stay afloat or expand. Without loans, companies couldn't invest in new projects or maintain their payrolls, leading to more closures and layoffs.

The Federal Reserve, instead of pumping money into the system to ease the contraction, raised interest rates and reduced the money supply in an attempt to defend the gold standard and maintain the value of the U.S. dollar. This made borrowing more costly and less accessible when the economy needed more liquidity. The resulting contraction in the money supply led to deflation, causing falling prices. While deflation might sound beneficial, it led to consumers and businesses delaying purchases, waiting for prices to drop further, which hampered production and led to more layoffs.

Bank failures shattered faith in the economy, leaving businesses unable to get credit and workers struggling to find jobs. The cascading bank failures, restrictive Federal Reserve policies, and contracting money supply created a vicious cycle of shrinking consumer confidence and tightening economic activity. This set the stage for the prolonged agony of the Great Depression, affecting individuals and families far beyond the financial figures and policy decisions.

The Gold Standard

The gold standard played a significant role in exacerbating the economic crisis, not just for the United States but for the entire world. Under the gold standard, countries' currencies were tied to fixed exchange rates based on gold. When the U.S. economy began to falter, it experienced massive deflation, making American goods more attractive to foreign buyers due to dropping prices. This led to a trade surplus for the U.S., with more goods being exported than imported.

Under the gold standard, a country with a trade surplus would experience an inflow of gold reserves to balance the trade. As the U.S. sold more goods abroad, it accumulated gold from countries with trade deficits. These countries, facing diminishing gold reserves, panicked and raised their interest rates to attract capital investments and protect their currencies from devaluation. However, higher interest rates also led to economic contraction, making borrowing more expensive and choking off investment and spending, further reducing production and employment in already struggling economies.

The gold standard mandated countries to deflate their economies to retain their gold reserves, creating widespread economic misery. As gold flowed from Europe to the U.S., European nations experienced deflationary pressures, falling production, soaring unemployment, and political instability. Some countries eventually abandoned the gold standard, triggering a wave of competitive devaluations.

The reduction in international trade, compounded by deflationary policies, made recovery slow for everyone involved. The gold standard, initially designed to stabilize currencies, had become a straitjacket, preventing nations from using monetary policy flexibly to counteract the Depression. Countries that abandoned the gold standard earlier, such as Japan and some Latin American nations, were able to implement monetary expansion more freely, helping them recover faster than those still bound by gold.

The gold standard acted as a global economic chain reaction, with one nation's economic despair rippling out and magnifying distress worldwide. It demonstrated the interconnectedness of economies and how financial policies could amplify misery on a global scale during the Great Depression era.

A conceptual image showing a balance scale with gold bars on one side and a variety of international currencies on the other, set against a backdrop of a world map.

Decreased International Lending and Tariffs

Decreased international lending and high tariffs, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, further contributed to the economic downturn. During the 1920s, U.S. banks provided significant loans to foreign countries, supporting their economies. However, as the U.S. economy weakened, banks pulled back on international lending, with high interest rates keeping capital within the country. Foreign countries that had relied on American credit suddenly found themselves in economic distress, with some slipping into downturns even before the U.S. situation became dire.

In an attempt to protect American farmers facing overproduction and falling food prices, the U.S. government passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, imposing steep tariffs on imported agricultural and industrial products. The goal was to make foreign goods more expensive and encourage consumers to favor domestic products. However, other countries retaliated with their own tariffs, leading to a sharp decline in global trade as countries became locked out of each other's markets.

The reduced flow of American dollars abroad and escalating tariffs led to a contraction in world trade. Countries couldn't sell as much abroad, resulting in an oversupply of goods at home, plunging prices, and further layoffs. For American businesses and consumers, retaliatory tariffs made it harder for U.S. exporters to find markets for their goods, just as the domestic economy was struggling. With fewer foreign buyers, American businesses reduced production, leading to more layoffs and depressed demand.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff became an infamous example of protectionism gone wrong, as it deepened the global depression by highlighting the interconnectedness and interdependence of world economies. The crash of American international lending and the wave of protectionist tariffs caused global trade to suffer, with countries turning inward to patch up their economies while inadvertently worsening the global situation.

The combined effects of these measures trapped countries in prolonged recessions, creating a domino effect of policy missteps and economic misfortunes that plunged the world further into the depths of the Great Depression. It demonstrated how actions taken with good intentions could have unintended and catastrophic consequences in an interconnected global economy.

A black and white photograph of a large cargo ship sitting idle at a port, with cranes and warehouses in the background, representing the decline in international trade.

Government Policies and Fiscal Responses

As the Great Depression deepened, President Hoover launched a series of interventions aimed at stemming the tide of economic despair. He summoned business leaders to the White House, pressing them to keep wages steady in hopes that sustained consumer spending would smooth over the rough patches. Hoover also launched an ambitious public works program, securing promises from private industry to invest in new construction and repairs, while the government doubled its own spending on infrastructure projects.

Despite these measures, unemployment soared and the economy continued to deteriorate. In 1932, Hoover established the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) to provide emergency loans to businesses on the brink of bankruptcy, focusing initially on banks, railroads, and agricultural organizations. However, the limited scope of RFC's lending resulted in a muted impact.

When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he embarked on a bold new approach: the New Deal. This epoch-defining series of programs and reforms aimed to rescue the American economy and provide direct relief to the devastated populace.

  • The Works Progress Administration (WPA) created jobs on a massive scale, employing millions in projects ranging from infrastructure to the arts.
  • The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) undertook vast hydroelectric projects, bringing power and modern infrastructure to impoverished regions.
  • The Social Security Act of 1935 established a social safety net, providing unemployment insurance, disability benefits, and pensions for the elderly.
  • The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created to guarantee deposits and restore trust in banks.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sought to regulate the stock market and prevent the kind of unfettered speculation that had fueled the 1920s boom.

However, the New Deal faced criticism from both conservatives, who claimed it was a step towards socialism, and liberals, who argued it didn't go far enough in addressing wealth inequality. Moreover, a renewed economic downturn in 1937 showed that the crisis was not entirely over.

Nonetheless, Roosevelt's policies provided tangible evidence that the government was willing to take bold action to address the economic crisis. While critics questioned the sustainability and efficacy of such sweeping intervention, for millions of Americans, the New Deal programs were a lifeline in a sea of despair.

In retrospect, while Hoover laid some important groundwork, it was Roosevelt's New Deal that marked a turning point in public policy and economic intervention. The massive industrial mobilization of World War II ultimately jolted the American economy back to life, absorbing the labor surplus and shifting industry into high gear1.

The interplay of policies and fiscal measures under Hoover and Roosevelt left enduring legacies: a reshaped role of government in economic life and established mechanisms for economic security. Both presidents learned that in the face of extreme adversity, bold action and sometimes unprecedented intervention were essential.

A black and white photograph of workers constructing a dam as part of a New Deal program, with heavy machinery and scaffolding visible.

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 wasn't just a financial collapse; it was a profound shift that affected millions. The intricate interplay of banking failures, restrictive monetary policies, and global economic ties created a perfect storm2. Yet, through the trials and tribulations, significant lessons were learned about economic resilience and the role of government intervention in stabilizing economies.

As John Kenneth Galbraith noted in his seminal work, "The Great Crash, 1929":

"The singular feature of the great crash of 1929 was that the worst continued to worsen. What looked one day like the end proved on the next day to have been only the beginning."

The legacy of the Great Depression and the policy responses it engendered continue to shape our understanding of economics and the role of government in mitigating crises. The lessons learned, though hard-won, have proven invaluable in navigating subsequent economic challenges.

William Montgomery
Latest posts by William Montgomery (see all)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top